Thursday, June 10, 2010

The Path To Destruction..

..Or at least the destruction of free will, choice, morality, take your pick...

(These are my theories about Stephani)
As I mentioned in my previous post, we need to consider that Stephani(crazy woman), was no different than many people, in some respects, who try and break into the music industry. The differences, however, from some others, is that I believe she has been groomed from early childhood, via mind control, to be available to the elites to eventually star in the roll that they had for her.
Though it may sound ridiculous to some, there is so much more we do not know that goes on behind the scenes. The Industry does not just make mere music, or pretty pictures, or happy stories..they are selling their own brand of control-far more influential than any politician could ever be. And with this extreme level of persuasion, why use anything else?
There are various areas that need to be covered in order to get people interested in, say, a musician....
Eventually placing Stephani in all areas of the media we see and hear was pivotal in her rise to simulated stardom.
This started with her being placed in clubs, and getting her performing skills sharpened for later plans by her handlers(for those unfamiliar, that is a mind control term for someone who owns/manipulates a mind-controlled slave). You can find videos online of her performing in the late 90's doing fairly unexciting shows in bars and clubs that were no different than many other people's.
Moving along, she was paired with a lesser-known musician named Lady Starlight,(who I get a weird feeling about. Who is this woman, and what was her role around Stephani behind the scenes. I suspect she aided her 'grooming') and Stephani's stage name was pushed as 'gaga'. Her look was changed, and there was the attempt to gain some exposure in the electro-dance and related music scene.
After some more moves on the chess game board, she had some plastic surgery, new wardrobe again, and landed videos like,'Just Dance'. It was then, she was interviewed more and more, by all manner of small and medium exposure magazines, on and offline. Usually, her answers to her questions were base, simple, unfeeling, and often immoral. She had no interest in anything except performing and getting attention. Relationships were irrelevant, but casual sex was acceptable. She was extremely wooden and robotic at this stage.
In an attempt to move her into even greater exposure, and seeing she was winning better attention within younger music fans, they then moved talk of her into mainstream music magazines, and eventually, news magazines. So we see at this point, if someone didn't even listen to popular music, they would discover images of her and discussion of her in areas where such things were usually less relevant. This seemingly pointless exercise worked, and we begin to see her face or mention, practically everywhere in the media.


You a club goer? Her music is at the club. People are talking about the video, or the interview they read.
Are you a teen or in under the age of 13? Then she's on cable tv, on Entertainment talk shows, online, on the popular music sites.
Are you a stay-at-home-Mom who doesn't really like listening to such music? She is at the grocery store, as you check out with your food items, on Cosmopolitan magazine(among others).
Are you a single male who doesn't even like top-40 billboard chart music? She is on the cover of 'Q' magazine and mentioned in men's magazines, as a sex symbol.
Are you of an alternative lifestyle? She is seen in popular gay magazine circles, fighting for lgbt rights and laws.
Are you an older single male, who doesn't even like modern music, or buys magazines? She is on the MSN main page as the head-lining story, talking about her appearance on the VMA award show(Don't forget, this seeming 'nobody', mere years before, met THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND. Regular folks who break into the Industry, do not meet political royalty of other countries. Time to wake up with that one!)
Are you a grandmother, who has cable, rarely watches any entertainment show, only gets online to check emails, but watches her Oprah? Fine, so she's interviewed on Oprah.

In this modern culture, if they want you interested in some one, or some thing-it is placed EVERYWHERE. Keep watch for patterns, and how much and how many places you see a person or subject. These aren't accidents you know.

Other tweaks were needed to make her more palatable to the 30-something and family crowd, so she was placed in front of well known interviewers/celebs such as Barbara Walters and finally, Oprah. It is vital to note what it means when this kind of exposure is being used on a person. We are talking about reaching into literally billions of homes through ALL forms of media. This meant she needed some alterations of her public persona. She would not use the ' f ' word with Oprah, but rather, now appears bubbly, actually laughs, and refrain from explaining how she would inflict self-harm and cut off her leg, rather than be famous(actual quote from a previous interview online). These are not the discussions of a mentally sound individual-even if they are joking. Healthy people do not joke this way-especially when other people, impressionable people, will listen and immitate you. But that is all part of the plan.

So we see, she has been moved along, funded and funded again, so we all know who she is. Short of playing her music to zoos full of animals, and underwater for sea life, she was being introduced to nearly everyone in modern culture! But why? Why was it so important to look at her-to listen to her? Simple. She was to be one of the major puppets(though not the only) in getting our current generation to fall into total and utter chaos.

After leaving the club and bar scene, and starting to make videos, there was an equally careful handling of her appearance. The songs, the clothes she wore, and the scenes she was placed in-even if seconds long, were all quite strategic.

Street Cred

Getting attention in the indie-label scene helps, but it's small potatoes in the grand scheme of things. To make your mark, you gotta reach even areas of people whom you know otherwise, won't like you, or care.

Stephani with her first album, appealed to 'The Brittney(Shakira/Madonna/etc) Crowd'. These were the partiers, the clubers, the teen to twenties age range, who just wanted to get off work and have a good time each week. That's what so many of the working class look forward to, after all, or at least what they are influenced to behave like. However, the 'Mariah'(modern pop/r&b/etc) crowd was not as excited about her. She was too 'weird'-her clothes and videos were not what they were looking for. So, the video,'Eh,Eh,Eh, Nothing Else I Can Say', helped reel this crowd in(among other ways). The sound is very much like a handful or more other musicians, and any other one of them could have sung it with similar results. This is not one that people really remember her for, but it was important to be made, in order to attract that other corner of listeners. Wrap this all up with a pitiful, but successful attempt to snag the 'art crowd', with performance art pieces publically done, and a short 'art film'.

So, as I am sure you can see, we are dealing with major attention to detail here, for one, single, solitary person-and I am just covering a few things! There is so much programming being pushed onto listeners, to behave, like, enjoy, and imitate what she does. The next post will go into 'Eh, Eh', song and video a little more...

No comments:

Post a Comment