Defender of Man, Do Not Call My Name...

I titled this post the above, because, defender of man, is the meaning of the name, Alexander. Alexander is the European version of alejandro.
Furthermore, the name Alexander in greek means, "to push back", "to hold off", and is an expression of battle prowess, and being able to "hold off the enemy". This is particularly interesting, in the context of both the alejandro song, and video.
The other names spoken in the song, and their meaning are:

Fernando: to be courageous
Roberto: fame and brightness

Also, somewhat interesting in the context of the song.

Now, this will most likely be a long analysis of the video and song, so please understand when I attempt to delve deeper in my personal impressions and theories, that it could take a bit to explain what I see, or I feel is being presented.

First, let's look at the lyrics of the song:


I know that we are young and I know you may love me
But I just can't be with you like this anymore, Alejandro

She's got both hands in her pockets
And she won't look at you, won't look at you
She hides true love, en su bolsillo
She's got a halo around her finger around you

You know that I love you, boy
Hot like Mexico, rejoice
At this point I gotta choose
Nothing to lose

Don't call my name, don't call my name, Alejandro
I'm not your babe, I'm not your babe, Fernando
Don't wanna kiss, don't wanna touch
Just smoke one cigarette and hush
Don't call my name, don't call my name, Roberto

Alejandro, Alejandro
Ale-Alejandro, Ale-Alejandro
Alejandro, Alejandro
Ale-Alejandro, Ale-Alejandro

Stop please, just let me go
Alejandro, just let me go

She's not broken, she's just a baby
But her boyfriend's like a dad, just like a dad
And all those flames that burned before him
Now he's gonna firefight, got cool the bad

You know that I love you, boy
Hot like Mexico, rejoice
At this point I gotta choose
Nothing to lose

Don't call my name, don't call my name, Alejandro
I'm not your babe, I'm not your babe, Fernando
Don't wanna kiss, don't wanna touch
Just smoke one cigarette and hush
Don't call my name, don't call my name, Roberto

Alejandro, Alejandro
Ale-Alejandro, Ale-Alejandro
Alejandro, Alejandro
Ale-Alejandro, Ale-Alejandro

Don't bother me, don't bother me, Alejandro
Don't call my name, don't call my name, bye Fernando
I'm not your babe, I'm not your babe, Alejandro
Don't wanna kiss, don't wanna touch, Fernando

Don't call my name, don't call my name, Alejandro
I'm not your babe, I'm not your babe, Fernando
Don't wanna kiss, don't wanna touch
Just smoke one cigarette and hush
Don't call my name, don't call my name, Roberto

Alejandro, Alejandro
Ale-Alejandro, Ale-Alejandro
Alejandro, Alejandro
Ale-Alejandro, Ale-Alejandro

Don't call my name, don't call my name, Alejandro
(Alejandro, Alejandro)
nI'm not your babe, I'm not your babe, Fernado
(Ale-Alejandro, Ale-Alejandro)
Don't wanna kiss, don't wanna touch
(Alejandro, Alejandro)
Just smoke one cigarette and hush
Don't call my name, don't call my name, Roberto
(Ale-Alejandro, Ale-Alejandro)
Alejandro

Now, let's assume this is Stephani's relationship with her past, and her upbringing. She was raised Catholic, and assuming her parents were also not under mind control, was raised seriously as an Italian Catholic to boot. For those who take their Christian faith seriously, there is rarely a deviation from it, as all of their life is fulfilled through it, ultimately and questions answered as they move along, trusting God, and His teachings.
But, obviously, anyone raised in a Christian context, has the same issues as any other human, and may go through a questioning phase. Not always, but a person may leave the teachings they were brought up with-especially in this day and age, and decide to adopt something else. It is the nature of our free will to choose God, or not.
Granted, the path, assuming she chose it, and it was not imposed upon her via mk mind control(I still suspect the 2nd), is clearly the path as far away from anything holy, as possible. Stephani's videos depict just about every sin, of the 7 deadly sin, with adultery being suggested, through attempting to lure married men's eyes to wander to her naked body on screen, which in this case, qualifies for me.(Others may split hairs on what adultery really is, but I am adhering to this definition, following basic Christian teaching).

In the song, Stephani is in the process of another breakup. Possibly with a Hispanic man, who is trying to keep speaking with her and reaching out to her. Repeatedly, she rejects his even saying anything to her, no matter what it is, and especially words of affection, or her name. She wants him to say absolutely nothing to her, and remove himself from her life, so she can walk away without being tempted to stay.
Curiously, she has great passion for him and his affection, and potentially actually loves him. This is a contradiction to her statement,'Nothing to lose'. That doesn't make good sense, because if she is abandoning her desire, or some element of fulfillment, she is clearly losing something. However, to further confuse the listener, subtly, she says she has nothing to lose anyway.
At the start of the lyrics, she tries to start the breakup, despite the fact that there are good reasons to say, being youthful, and full of actual love for another person. In other words, they have every reason to otherwise, be together.
For some unknown reason, she still doesn't want to be with this mystery person, Alejandro.
The first verse shows is some interesting things about her character, however, when she says she, 'has both hands in her pockets'. The catch phrase in pop culture,'I got it in the bag', or having something,'in your back pocket', can mean that you have a situation under your control, or some authority over a circumstance, or thing. It can also mean you will win something, or succeed in something, without much effort. Based on that possibility, and the following lines,
And she won't look at you, won't look at you
She hides true love, en su bolsillo(in the pocket)
She's got a halo around her finger around you

we can conclude that the hands in her pocket are both a physical, body-language reminder that she is 'closed off' to any conversation, or affection, but also, that her hands symbolize the power of this relationship to continue(an closed first, not an open hand joining another's). She genuinely loves this person, but she is deliberately hiding her feelings in every way. On top of this, she says she 'has a halo around her finger, around you'. I take this to mean, she has had this person loving her back so much, she has much control over him, as he's,'wrapped around her finger', so to speak. But, this could also be a physical symbol, such as a ring he has given her.
If it's her having him 'wrapped around her finger', then the 'halo' is either his innocence of her being deceitful, or her pretending innocence in this relationship all this time, so she is a liar, and now guilty.
If this is a ring, the word 'halo' is significant. This is because a 'halo' is usually a symbol historically, of something spiritually and in a Christian sense, holy. Saints, Icons and Angels in historical artwork, are shown with halos, to represent that they are at a closer connection with God, and radiate that connection. It can also represent a lack of sinning, or temptation to sin(in the Christian context, usually). It can represent chastity-not giving yourself sexually to someone, before marriage. This also is interesting, because the ring could be a commitment to be chaste until marriage to this man she sings to. But, it could also be a general commitment to be faithful to this person only.
When she says she feels when they are together, there is definite and notable passion in her heart, or her body, she is acknowledging that she is attracted to this person, possibly on every level. She admits this to him even verbally here. But then, confusingly, says she has to choose, so there must he another better alternative to her, to being passionate and happy with one person-though we never hear what that other choice is she is running toward. She compares her love to Mexico, and the heat of the temperatures in that part of the world, and the stereotypes of hot food and hot, passionate personalities there. Why Mexico is mentioned in general though, is curious. Much like the Madonna song,'La Isla Bonita', Stephani continues this program to honor Mexico in a song. There has to be a greater significance to this, to me, but I am not exactly sure what that is. There may be some connections by the elites to Mexico, for years, that others are in the dark about. Who knows. But I digress..

If we add in the English translation of the other names she calls this person she is leaving, it becomes more complex. Sure, he could have a nickname she has been calling him, but two? I found that odd. Nevertheless, this is how that part of the song would look, if the name meanings are added in, and certain words elaborated:
Don't call me to you, don't call me your's,Defender of Man, Defender from The Enemy
I'm not your only one, I'm not your's alone, Courageous One
Don't want to show my true feelings
Just be quiet
Don't call me, don't call me your's, Famous and Bright One

Now we can clearly see, these lyrics look very different indeed. She is not only refusing this person, but she is refusing them, despite some hugely important elements about them. And personally, I believe, this courageous, bright defender, is the previous role of Christ, and/or Christianity, in her life, once upon a time(and conversely, the enemy of Christ, and God, is satan). It's my theory, and others may have other theories, but I will select this, for now as the deeper meanings here.
Do I believe she really wrote this? Yes, I think the likelihood is very good that she did, and does write her own songs. Many mind controlled people in the Industry write, perform and are marvelously talented. It is expected of them to be so talented, that they will perform near flawless, and bring in many crowds, attention and money-thus furthering the elites agendas for them. But, like all humans, they still have a soul. And as such, their subconscious, even through mind control, can creep into their creations, from time to time.

Breakup songs do not seem like the 'crazy lady' persona, that so many people know and love about her out there. They don't fit this person, who flips everyone off, and is callous and so removed from real life. I think, if she did write this, she is showing a possible part of herself, that is symbolically coming out. It is not uncommon for an mk slave to write about the deepest part of their soul, even if they themselves, cannot see it for what it really is.

The additional lyrics:
She's not broken, she's just a baby
But her boyfriend's like a dad, just like a dad
And all those flames that burned before him
Now he's gonna firefight, got cool the bad

Could mean:

She's not so messed up she abuses people on purpose, she is too consistently immature to know any better
But she sees her boyfriend, as someone who protects and looks out for her, which she wants nothing to do with such protective, loving care
And all that strong love she once had, is being repressed
Now he is going to fight another kind of fire back, as he is burned by her cruelty, and needs to ice his emotional wounds

That last line in the song, is a guess, because of the peculiar wording in context with everything else. Fire was meaning passion and love for almost the entire song, but then he, the one she is leaving, is fighting another kind of fire. Perhaps it represents how she has turned her fire of love, into fire of burning pain, or emotional injury, and he will need to try and nurse this new wound she caused, from rejection.

To make this post a little less lengthy, I am breaking it away from the video analysis, and creating another post for that instead. But I still think the possibility exists, she is showing her soul, leaving The Church, and her faith here, hidden in these words.

The Next Step:Invasion/Domination

So, what's left to lose, when nothing is left to lose? The answer, obviously, is nothing.

(Note the image for the alejandro single, with Stephani wearing a raven-like, black winged head piece. Birds not only feature in MK{see also Miley Cyrus's caged bird video}, but also a number of occultic and mythological references)

That statement could be what the influential and hidden people behind the alejandro video were thinking.(I don't even wish to capitalize the name of the song, it's just not even worth a capital letter placement)

So far, we have see many, many plans laid into place, to create the mind-control techniques set into place, using Stephani as it's center. Generally speaking, America tends to have one, major blond female to carry in something morally less inviting.

One of the earliest was Jean Harlow, a very famous blond actress from the 1930's, who died early of a tooth infection. But while alive, certainly tested the waters for what it meant to lure men away from more sobering thoughts.

Certainly, the next in line was Marilyn Monroe, who is named by some, as the first mk, presidential sex slave. She was, like many mk slaves, a divided mess, dabbling in the occult, and even channeling a spirit by the name of 'sugar cane', to enable her to have mastery over others, and greater acting ability. She would often call on this spirit in her career. Many others around her, who worked with her, said she was 'spell binding'. And though that phrase has been thrown around for years, rather loosely, you gotta really look at it in this context. 'Spell'...'Binding'. Creepy.

There was to be a cast of other, influential blonds here and there in the spotlight later, from Andy Warhol's muse Edie, to the 70's Farah, there wasn't one who seemed to bring any real and lasting value into the hearts of mind's of the American people. They were used for entertainment, a play thing, a fantasy tool.

Madonna(also possible mkslave with a graduation of sorts, not fully breaking down in the her 30's as some of the slaves do), was to prove the longest standing blond influence and poison to our society of the lineage.

Like the Stephani plan for 'street cred', she supposedly 'worked her way up' to stardom, and into the hearts of millions. She attempted to hit the art and street culture/music scene, which started her as a rebellious young woman. This brought her into years later, of immitating Marilyn, luring people into considering fetishistic and overtly sexual behavior as 'normal'. She would be shown off as extremely vain, uncaring, and usually, very foolish.

The famous 'passing the torch of influence' to Brittney Spears, during the MTV awards, I believe, was a failed celebration. I say this, because of the two she ritually kissed and passed along her stardom/spell over others, only Christina has been successfully following the program, set by the elites. I believe, due to all the trauma, Brittney has not done so well, and thus, proved unreliable. Another person had to be moved into place, that could continue this deception, and so we see Stephani quickly enter the picture.

I believe, in a sort of half-assed way, the appearance of Madonna and Stephani on Saturday Night Live, kissing, was the new deal being sealed.



Stephani is Moved Along Further



I sometimes wonder what could be next in line for us to view, or accept as normal. What could be more violent? More base? More immoral? It's most certainly a careful chess game to those in power, using people like Stephani as their pawn. Move her too far, people will cry out. But move her just far enough, then pretend it's 'art', for the sake of 'art', and you can hide behind it again and again.

I have a variety of theories about the alejandro video. For some reason, there does bare a slight resemblance to the stage of Madonna's career with Like a Prayer and Vogue. And I cannot emphasize enough, this is not an immitation of Madonna, but a revisit of an old program. It's a repeat of something not even solely thought up by Madonna, so it's not so much a copy of an idea, but a repeat and a continuation of an ongoing game plan. It's the same thing, not so much an immitation. It's also the next level of the same thing. The same thing, intensified and made more potent.

Much like a sweet potion, it's given to others to drink, who won't ask,'Well, what's in it, before I drink it??'

'Does it smell sweet?', asks the suspicious giver.

'Yes'.

'Does it look good? Have a pretty color? Didn't I pour you plenty?'

'Well, yes.'

'Then why are you hesitating, this is good, and so, drink it!!'

Videos such as alejandro are given in much the same way. It's well filmed, with a high budget, with a top-ranking pop star, has a catchy repetition, and danceable beat. So watch it. Dance to it, circulate it, love it. Ignore the man behind the curtain. Ignore your initial feeling, something is very wrong her. This tastes funny, ignore your uncertain feelings.

But folks, those uncertain feelings are put inside of you by God, for a reason. Here and there, people who ordinarily like Stephani's music/videos, have said they like the song, but like the video less. And why? Because they are sensing something is wrong with what they are drinking. And rightly so!

If a person feels uneasy, confused or unclear about something, no one is encouraging them to pause, consider and regroup their thoughts and feelings. They have no basis of comparison, and potentially, no one to help them work this out, objectively.

It's time to understand, poison, sweetened with the sweetest nectar, is still poison.

In the next post, I will give my theories and breakdown, of the video and song for alejandro...

Nothing Else to Say(Except This..)

So, one evening, I found myself seeing that abominable,'Telephone', video, and checking out all the symbolism, when I happened upon the,'Eh, Eh, Eh, Nothing Else I Can Say', video from Stephani(I call her this, cause it's the name she was born with, for heck's sake).
I was immediately struck with how decidedly different of an approach was used with her in the video. She was nothing like the,'Just Dance', video, or,'Pokerface'. It was really odd to me.
If you haven't seen it, have a look at it on youtube(easy to find-thanks to corporate vevo). We see her in 4 different locations: The Kitchen, The Bedroom, A Pizza Parlor and The Street.
Below, are some of the notable things within it, and the ways she is portrayed:

The Playfully Innocent Yet Promiscuous Teen

The character is seen in two locations, presumably, which include the street and the bedroom( she also looks like the sexy wife character).

This stereotype, has friends who enjoy flirting, and waving themselves at everyone locally. Based on the appearance of the locals, as well as the sign flashing, 'Italia', we can assume this is supposed to be a Hollywood portrayal of an Italian street, or an Italian ideal street.
We also see this character in the Pizza Parlor, showing off her body, and if you think about it, not wearing a whole lot. We are so desensitized into thinking showing a lot of skin is ordinary now, that we don't consider this person is wearing a swimsuit walking down the street in broad daylight.
Furthermore, this character is self-assured, standing on a seat(for no other reason than to show off her body) in the pizza parlor.

For those watching who are mkslaves, any number of these images in this video, or any Stephani video, could be triggers or programs to behave certain ways(usually sexual).

The Movie Star(Or High Price Call Girl)


This character is either a high price prostitute, or a famous movie star. But, since she isn't being flocked to, and alone, on or near a scooter, it could be she is waiting for someone to come back, or just trying to hang around where the people are, hoping to attract attention. I tend to think she the prostitute, based on her being alone in this example.

The Single Girl(or teen, or sexy wife?) in Bed

She looks as if she could be any of the other characters, except she is alone in a single style bed. Not a large bed. From the bright pastels, it tends to look like a younger female's room(remember, we are talking stereotypes here). Though it could be a single girl, it's most likely the teen's room, and she is being flirtatious, playing coy, and showing she is ready for the viewer to join her.

The Sexy Housewife

Simply put, the extent of this character, is to look pretty, sexy, act sexy, dress sexy, and cook and clean. To fulfill the desires of a 1950's ideal housewife, perpetuated heavily around that time, in America, but to some extent, also abroad. There is a nod by the director/her handler/those behind the video, to famous blond sex symbols such as Brigit Bardot(though French, not Italian).

We see Stephani portrayed often as some type of previous sex symbol, in one way or another, to try and evoke interest from every type of man, or woman, wishing to attract every type of man. Blonds are also very important to the elite, and their occult practices. Very rarely, do major females in the spotlight, remain a darker color-even if they're born with it.

The Famous Blond Bombshell MovieStar

Finally, this is the ultimate character, and the high-ranking one-influence-wise. The Marilyn Monroe-look, just before she died, incidentally(had almost that identical hairdo).
Men are all around her, she doesn't even have to try, they gather around, because she is so attractive to them. Her being covered in daisy flowers, and the strong use of pink and yellow, are also powerful mk triggers

Even the song itself, lyrically encourages a stereotype or two...

Cherry, cherry, boom, boom
Gaga

Boy, we've had a real good time
And I wish you the best on your way, eh, eh
I didn't mean to hurt you
I never thought we'd fall out of place, eh, eh

I have something that I love long, long
But my friends keepa' tellin' me that something's wrong
Then I met someone
And eh, there's nothing else I can say

Eh, eh, there's nothing else I can say
Eh, eh, I wish he never looked at me that way
Eh, eh, there's nothing else I can say
Eh, eh

Not that I don't care about you
Just that things got so complicated, eh, eh
I met somebody cute and funny
Got each other and that's funny, eh, eh, eh

I have something that I love long, long
But my friends keepa' tellin' me that something's wrong
Then I met someone
And eh, there's nothing else I can say

Eh, eh, there's nothing else I can say
Eh, eh, I wish he never looked at me that way
Eh, eh, there's nothing else I can say
Eh, eh

I have something that I love long, long
But my friends keepa' tellin' me that something's wrong
Then I met someone
And eh, there's nothing else I can say

Eh, eh, eh, eh, eh, there's nothing else I can say
Eh, eh, wish he never looked at me that way
Eh, eh, there's nothing else I can say

Eh, eh, wish he never looked at me that way
Eh, eh, there's nothing else I can say
Eh, eh, cherry, cherry, boom, boom

Eh, eh
Oh, yeah
All I can say is, eh


In this song(if you even wanna call it that), the character singing is explaining to someone she's been dating, or involved more seriously with, that she met a person more attractive and amusing to her, than he. And to justify it, she tries to say it's the fault of the other person, putting the blame on them, instead of taking any responsibility for her own free will, that he shouldn't have flirted with her, or looked at her with affection and interest.
She even goes to far as to say,'It's funny', which most likely, it isn't to the one she is kicking to the curb(she probably is trying to say it's unusual how it worked out that way, with the use of the common world 'funny'). If she says she didn't mean to hurt him, based on her earlier comment in the song, we can conclude by the rest, that she is only being polite, as to say such a sentiment-if you can even call it that.
Basically, she is vacuous, without any real thought, except her own interests, and self pleasure. She is even warned by her friends, that she isn't behaving wisely or correctly, but she ignores them.
Songs like this appeal to the most base level of a female, attempting to evoke an attraction to imitate it at a very subtle level. This is especially geared toward young women, girls and maybe even younger. These characters look like a Barbie, easily.
Stereotypes like these, are set into place, to make taking advantage of women easier, and to give the appearance to the females, that it's fun, powerful and worth while to behave this way. Everyone wants to be admired, and to be self assured. Plus, you can be with whomever you want, without consequence, because you don't have to be smart, or have answers, or be responsible. All you ever need to do is serve the man you are with or, always be sexy!
Her final thought on the matter of the breakup in this song, is a plain and simple,'Eh', or, 'DUH'. She is void of the ability to defend, help, care or stay in reality. She is a 'dumb blond'.

So what have we learned? That if you are a female, you can be sexy and flirty, you'll get the attention you want. Or, you can skip that, and go for getting people to pay you for your affections, and you can be rich, beautiful and independent, almost like a movie star. Or, you can marry, but be sure, even if you need to do chores and housework, and other duties, that your sole duty is to be sexy and ready for sex. Or, that you can shoot for the goal of superior worshipping status, and aim to be a big, movie star/sex symbol(If you are willing to sell your soul, of course). If you set this goal, you won't even have to try to be anything else, just looking gorgeous is enough.
Videos like these, set standards, and create a world, in the viewers mind, very suggestively, that these choices are the only choices to be, if you are a woman. That's it.
Naturally, these choices SUCK! LOL

P.s. I did wonder, with the old fashioned nods at 50's and 60's Italy from films here, if this wasn't an ad of sorts, for certain people to use Stephani dressed and behaving as these stereotypes, as a sort of fantasy thing. It is said, by some truthers, that ads in magazines with many models and stars, are actually ads for their sexual services in secret, used by the elites. The music and influence on the masses, is an added beneficial perk to those who use slaves such as these, in our modern day.

P.p.s. In the lyrics of this song the 'cherry', and, 'boom', could equate as possible slang for, a woman's privates, and backside, being repeated. Maybe like an ad as goods(herself) for sale? And worse yet, songs like these, like her's, have so much repetition, it's especially addictive for little kids and girls to repeat back and sing to themselves. Ghastly.*gagging*

The Path To Destruction..

..Or at least the destruction of free will, choice, morality, take your pick...

(These are my theories about Stephani)
As I mentioned in my previous post, we need to consider that Stephani(crazy woman), was no different than many people, in some respects, who try and break into the music industry. The differences, however, from some others, is that I believe she has been groomed from early childhood, via mind control, to be available to the elites to eventually star in the roll that they had for her.
Though it may sound ridiculous to some, there is so much more we do not know that goes on behind the scenes. The Industry does not just make mere music, or pretty pictures, or happy stories..they are selling their own brand of control-far more influential than any politician could ever be. And with this extreme level of persuasion, why use anything else?
There are various areas that need to be covered in order to get people interested in, say, a musician....
Eventually placing Stephani in all areas of the media we see and hear was pivotal in her rise to simulated stardom.
This started with her being placed in clubs, and getting her performing skills sharpened for later plans by her handlers(for those unfamiliar, that is a mind control term for someone who owns/manipulates a mind-controlled slave). You can find videos online of her performing in the late 90's doing fairly unexciting shows in bars and clubs that were no different than many other people's.
Moving along, she was paired with a lesser-known musician named Lady Starlight,(who I get a weird feeling about. Who is this woman, and what was her role around Stephani behind the scenes. I suspect she aided her 'grooming') and Stephani's stage name was pushed as 'gaga'. Her look was changed, and there was the attempt to gain some exposure in the electro-dance and related music scene.
After some more moves on the chess game board, she had some plastic surgery, new wardrobe again, and landed videos like,'Just Dance'. It was then, she was interviewed more and more, by all manner of small and medium exposure magazines, on and offline. Usually, her answers to her questions were base, simple, unfeeling, and often immoral. She had no interest in anything except performing and getting attention. Relationships were irrelevant, but casual sex was acceptable. She was extremely wooden and robotic at this stage.
In an attempt to move her into even greater exposure, and seeing she was winning better attention within younger music fans, they then moved talk of her into mainstream music magazines, and eventually, news magazines. So we see at this point, if someone didn't even listen to popular music, they would discover images of her and discussion of her in areas where such things were usually less relevant. This seemingly pointless exercise worked, and we begin to see her face or mention, practically everywhere in the media.


You a club goer? Her music is at the club. People are talking about the video, or the interview they read.
Are you a teen or in under the age of 13? Then she's on cable tv, on Entertainment talk shows, online, on the popular music sites.
Are you a stay-at-home-Mom who doesn't really like listening to such music? She is at the grocery store, as you check out with your food items, on Cosmopolitan magazine(among others).
Are you a single male who doesn't even like top-40 billboard chart music? She is on the cover of 'Q' magazine and mentioned in men's magazines, as a sex symbol.
Are you of an alternative lifestyle? She is seen in popular gay magazine circles, fighting for lgbt rights and laws.
Are you an older single male, who doesn't even like modern music, or buys magazines? She is on the MSN main page as the head-lining story, talking about her appearance on the VMA award show(Don't forget, this seeming 'nobody', mere years before, met THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND. Regular folks who break into the Industry, do not meet political royalty of other countries. Time to wake up with that one!)
Are you a grandmother, who has cable, rarely watches any entertainment show, only gets online to check emails, but watches her Oprah? Fine, so she's interviewed on Oprah.

In this modern culture, if they want you interested in some one, or some thing-it is placed EVERYWHERE. Keep watch for patterns, and how much and how many places you see a person or subject. These aren't accidents you know.

Other tweaks were needed to make her more palatable to the 30-something and family crowd, so she was placed in front of well known interviewers/celebs such as Barbara Walters and finally, Oprah. It is vital to note what it means when this kind of exposure is being used on a person. We are talking about reaching into literally billions of homes through ALL forms of media. This meant she needed some alterations of her public persona. She would not use the ' f ' word with Oprah, but rather, now appears bubbly, actually laughs, and refrain from explaining how she would inflict self-harm and cut off her leg, rather than be famous(actual quote from a previous interview online). These are not the discussions of a mentally sound individual-even if they are joking. Healthy people do not joke this way-especially when other people, impressionable people, will listen and immitate you. But that is all part of the plan.

So we see, she has been moved along, funded and funded again, so we all know who she is. Short of playing her music to zoos full of animals, and underwater for sea life, she was being introduced to nearly everyone in modern culture! But why? Why was it so important to look at her-to listen to her? Simple. She was to be one of the major puppets(though not the only) in getting our current generation to fall into total and utter chaos.

After leaving the club and bar scene, and starting to make videos, there was an equally careful handling of her appearance. The songs, the clothes she wore, and the scenes she was placed in-even if seconds long, were all quite strategic.

Street Cred

Getting attention in the indie-label scene helps, but it's small potatoes in the grand scheme of things. To make your mark, you gotta reach even areas of people whom you know otherwise, won't like you, or care.

Stephani with her first album, appealed to 'The Brittney(Shakira/Madonna/etc) Crowd'. These were the partiers, the clubers, the teen to twenties age range, who just wanted to get off work and have a good time each week. That's what so many of the working class look forward to, after all, or at least what they are influenced to behave like. However, the 'Mariah'(modern pop/r&b/etc) crowd was not as excited about her. She was too 'weird'-her clothes and videos were not what they were looking for. So, the video,'Eh,Eh,Eh, Nothing Else I Can Say', helped reel this crowd in(among other ways). The sound is very much like a handful or more other musicians, and any other one of them could have sung it with similar results. This is not one that people really remember her for, but it was important to be made, in order to attract that other corner of listeners. Wrap this all up with a pitiful, but successful attempt to snag the 'art crowd', with performance art pieces publically done, and a short 'art film'.

So, as I am sure you can see, we are dealing with major attention to detail here, for one, single, solitary person-and I am just covering a few things! There is so much programming being pushed onto listeners, to behave, like, enjoy, and imitate what she does. The next post will go into 'Eh, Eh', song and video a little more...

The Crazy Woman

I decided to title this entry,'crazy woman', because the popular singer who goes by the name,'Lady Gaga', holds a name that basically means the same thing. What we are seeing this person participate in, on a global scale, mesmerizing millions of people(or at least grabbing their attention the rest of the time), is both criminal and a constant state of smoke-and-mirror trickery. The potential that she is also not in control of her own actions(which is always a distinct possibility), is equally terrible.
Overall, we have seen a person, one, simple person, not involved in politics-heck, not even that old, be suddenly propelled to extreme heights of exposure. It is very important that the public at large be aware of the abnormality of this occurrence. This is decidedly not normal, by any means, for someone in a mere couple of years, to get the kind of attention that this single individual has.

If you go back a little bit, you will see that this person, was no different than any other in the music or entertainment scene, in many ways. Supposedly, they know someone, know gets them a record deal, they make more connections, and record some more material, and eventually, try touring and/or breaking into the billboard charts, if they can.
In many hidden circles, there is the discussion of the industry being a fraternal order, much like a secret society in and of themselves. If you do not play the game, by the rules of the elite who now own nearly the entire industry itself, you will not be allowed to tour, or sell the music you make and record, let alone get one lick of exposure on television or the mainstream.
Ten years ago, 50 corporate companies owned the labels and entertainment media that we see around us now, every day. However, since then, that relatively decent number has become a mere 5. Yes, 5. That, no doubt, could dwindle to 3, then 2, then 1 single, gigantic company owning ALL the major media we read,watch and listen to. This, no doubt, would further squash any and all competition, because there will be no competition. Independent labels and musicians will be silenced by a simple buy-out, or other tactics which will prevent them to having any attention. I could easily see this occurring in our near future.
Nevertheless, back to the Crazy Woman...
So, if you go back, as I said above, and chart her progress, you will that at some point, she was heavily funded and pushed inside the media, to help propel her into the spotlight you see her in today. This is not just mere talent and a few people saying,'Ok, we will give you a try-your talent and abilities are sensational!' That is a delusion to think that anyone is allowed to gain the kind of attention that she has in this way. The Industry paints a picture like this for many current celebs, but that is simply not real life. To take such chances, risks the power and money of those in higher places of influence, so you'd better believe they want someone who will be a reliable puppet for them. They will either be under mind control well before they are allowed to perform to millions, or they will be so deeply entranced, so jaded and fed they can have anything they want if they play the game, they will no longer be a threat to those that fund them.
And though some people believe that this crazy woman has been aware of her actions, and was wooed into this position by her own vanity, I tend to think she is not in control of her own actions. Only God knows for sure, but that is the current school of thought I subscribe too at present.
There are many, many different reasons that I feel this way; the countless mind control themes surrounding her, her past, her upbringing, the things she says and does, for me to believe this so strongly.
The next post will cover some of the start of her exposure, and what was possible goings-on behind the scenes of her supposed success, that I feel are good to consider...

Introduction..

Greetings to Everyone Who Is Reading This,

This is Terre, and you are viewing a blog, dedicated to a combination of themes, joined into one. Those include: nwo, mkultra and occultist themes in our contemporary culture to date. These subjects tend to cross over into one another quite often, so the posts here will be under that umbrella.
For those new to these topics, I reccomend that you do some personal reading within the following links, as they can get you aquainted with what exactly it is I am trying to communicate here:

Pseudo-Occult Media
The Industry Exposed

The start of this blog will have a series of posts, charting the influence of 'Lady Gaga', and the elements of her exposure. This will also include why many aspects of things related to this celeb are socially and morally harmful, as well as highly manipulative. Future posts will be decidedly less gaga related, but I wanted to cover this, so it's out of the way.
Further ahead, we will see some mk ultra suggestion in some 70's and 80's media, as it began creeping into the foreground.

Thanks, and God Bless You All
-Terre